Úr ýmsum áttum ll: Pólitík, friður, náttúruhamfarir og himingeimurinn

Málstofustjóri: Magnús Skjöld

Sjá ágrip erindanna hér fyrir neðan.

Iceland in Space: The past and future of space exploration in Iceland

This paper pursues what is being done in Iceland in the way of space exploration and traces the history and connection Iceland has in relation to past space exploration, from being training grounds for the first NASA astronauts in the 1960s, to serving as Mars Analog in the 21 century. It also pursues its potential and the arguments that are made for it to be a full participant in the European Space Agency (ESA) and traces the course of its application to do so. Finally three potential future scenarios are assessed. i) The status quo, i.e. continued lack of governmental engagement and non-membership of Iceland of ESA. ii) a full membership of ESA, enhancing current activities, and adding some new ones, without a specific emphasis on it on behalf of the government, and iii) an ambitious space program led and supported by the government, focusing on making space research and exploration a priority within the Icelandic scientific community, building on Iceland’s strengths in that respect.

Magnús Skjöld

Lykilorð: space exploration, governance

Stuðningsflokkar minnihlutastjórna og hlutverk þeirra á Alþingi

Hér verða athugaðar íslenskar minnihlutastjórnir, einkum 1927–89, og leitast við að fylla upp í fyrirliggjandi rannsóknir, þar sem áherslan hefur verið á myndun stjórnanna, oftast með „hlutleysi“ eða tímabundnum stuðningi annarra flokka. Hér er athuguð samvinna stjórnar- og stuðningsflokka, einkum á Alþingi. Mynda þeir samstæðan þingmeirihluta við kjör þingforseta og þingnefnda og e.t.v. aðrar kosningar? Sýna sameiginleg nefndarálit og atkvæðagreiðslur með nafnakalli að þeir starfi saman að afgreiðslu mála, a.m.k. fjárlaga og tengdra mála?

Niðurstöður sýna verulega fjölbreytni, allt frá Alþýðuflokknum 1927–30, sem veitti stjórninni ótímabundinn stuðning og myndaði samstæðan þingmeirihluta með stjórnarflokknum; og til Sósíalistaflokksins 1942 sem studdi stjórnina tímabundið, einungis vegna kjördæmabreytingar, en var að flestu leyti í stöðu stjórnarandstöðuflokks. Önnur dæmi raðast þarna á milli, þó með ýmsum flækjum, eins og Sósíalistaflokkurinn sem taldist ekki einu sinni stuðningsflokkur við stjórnarmyndun 1958, þótt stjórnin treysti á samstarf við hann um kjördæmabreytingu, en kom fram á sumarþinginu 1959 sem hluti af býsna samstæðum þingmeirihluta.

Þetta er að svo stöddu einföld athugun, lýsandi fremur en greinandi, og langmest byggð á Alþingistíðindum. En sýnir hvers vænta mætti af dýpri  rannsókn með fleiri spurningum (t.d. um embættaveitingar í þágu stuðningsflokka), víðtækari heimildum (m.a. blaðaefni) og greinandi svörum.

Helgi Skúli Kjartansson

Lykilorð: minnihlutastjórnir, stuðningsflokkar, Alþingi

Past, present and future of disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) within peacekeeping operations

Since its appearance in the late 1980s, ex-combatant disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) has become an indissoluble aspect of peacekeeping operations. As the conception of peace and development have become more comprehensive, more tasks have been assumed by both peacekeeping operations and DDR programs regarding medium-term stabilization and post-conflict transitions. This has generated a number of robust mandates and longer interventions that have brought along new challenges for the operations in the field. In the absence of alternate peacekeeping and peacebuilding tools, DDR is being launched even in scenarios where there is no peace to keep, adding new risks and challenges to peacekeeping operations and DDR programs. DDR is a milestone towards lasting peace, but not a miraculous solution for the roots of conflict. Although DDR is considered a highly technical methodology, it doesn’t work in the field as smoothly as in paper.  DDR is facing a context of changes in the ways of waging war, and subsequently, needs to adapt to the conflict dynamics in current and future contexts of intervention. Finally, the growth in their scope is creating a cost-increasing situation, for both DDR and peacekeeping operations, that blurs the exit strategy. This situation leaves open the question of where does peacekeeping and DDR end what peace or conditions are expected to be left after an intervention.

Dylan Herrera og Andrea González

Lykilorð: peacekeeping, DDR, peacebuilding

Public support for counter-terrorism measures in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden

The Nordic democracies have traditionally enjoyed long, uninterrupted periods of peace, even when other Western nations found themselves increasingly challenged by terrorism and other conflicts with non-state actors. However, this has changed somewhat in the past decade or so, with far-right domestic terrorism in Norway (July 2011) and multiple acts of both far-right and Islamist terrorism in Sweden (2010–2017). Despite this, the Nordic democracies have maintained relatively high levels of social and political trust, and are considered to remain committed to human rights and civil liberties, presenting challenges to the use of controversial counter-terrorism measures in these states. In this paper, we use survey data gathered in three Nordic democracies (Iceland, Norway, and Sweden) to examine support for a range of different counter-terrorism measures. To estimate the complex relationships between demography, attitudes, and support for these measures, we employ a structural equation model with theorised latent variables for the type of security/liberty trade-off required by each measure. Our findings emphasise that while Nordic social solidarity and collectivism may facilitate a certain level of authoritarian counter-terrorism, this is limited by the characteristic levels of trust and education in these states—though the limits differ according to the exact trade-off involved.

Luke Field, Margrét Valdimarsdóttir og Guðbjörg Andrea Jónsdóttir

Lykilorð: political psychology, public opinion, terrorism

„Recovering from the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull“

Many communities in Iceland are located near active volcanic systems and can be severely impacted by volcanic eruptions. Localized social support networks, providing emotional, informational and tangible support, are crucial for communities dealing with volcanic impact.

This study examined the importance of social support in communities affected by the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption in Iceland, and how current practices can be improved to ensure that recovery is as effective as possible.The research approach was qualitative using data from in-depth interviews of families living near Eyjafjallajökull, as well as from public documents. The impact of the volcanic tephra raised multiple concerns among the families and caused challenges that exceeded their adaptation ability. Strong social support from primary group members was a key factor in optimizing response and recovery efforts. The support from response workers was also considered essential during and immediatly after the event. However, the impacted families soon realized that the need for long-term support exceeded the availability of resources.

This research aims to enhance our understanding of the relations between social support networks and disaster mitigation. The paper outlines recommendations on how the social support networks can be improved to render the recovery phase more efficient and reduce the impact of natural hazards on the population of Iceland.

Ingibjörg Lilja Ómarsdóttir, Guðrún Gísladóttir, Guðrún Pétursdóttir og Deanne K Bird

Lykilorð: social support, community resilience, natural disaster

Höfundar erinda
Annað / Other
Prófessor emeritus
Doktorsnemi
Nýdoktor / Post Doc
Doktorsnemi / PhD student
Prófessor / Professor
Tímasetning
  • Málstofa hefst
    29/10, 2021 09:00
  • Málstofu lýkur
    29/10, 2021 10:45
Thjodarspegill_stubbur 2 2021
Finndu málstofu